SBTi Net-Zero Standard v2

From ambition to action.

Over a decade, more than 11,000 companies set validated targets. v2 is built on what came next: committing was never the hard part — delivering is.

01 · A or B?

Which rules apply to you?

v2 sorts every company into Category A or Category B. Answer three quick questions, and every requirement on this page flips to yours.

Net annual turnover
Employees (FTE)
HQ income group

Answer the three questions and we’ll stamp your category on the spot.

Until you do, every badge below shows both sides — Category A and Category B.

This approximates Table 2 (p.19). A medium company in a high-income country also counts as Category A when its scope 1+2 emissions reach ≥ 10,000 tCO₂e, or when it meets at least two of: balance sheet ≥ €25M, turnover ≥ €50M, FTE ≥ 250.

Definitive requirements: the published Standard, Section B.3, Table 2 (p.19).

02 · TIMELINE

One loop, repeated to 2050.

Published June 2026, effective February 2027 — and from there the same five-year cycle turns over and over until only residual emissions are left.

Definitive requirements: the published Standard — Chapters 1–6, effective dates per the published transition timeline.

03 · GOVERNANCE

Net-zero starts in the boardroom.

Three commitments anchor the whole cycle: strong governance, a transition plan at validation, and carbon woven into your commercial strategy.

GOVERNANCE · CNZS-C1

Board sign-off, not just sustainability sign-off

Your highest governing body — the Board or equivalent — has to formally own your SBTi targets, not merely note them.

Open detail →

What it means for you

The Board agrees to set your targets, submit them, and oversee their delivery. You also describe your governance structure and document how you'll review and adjust targets over time.

← Back

TRANSITION PLAN · CNZS-C2

A transition plan, due at validation

Every company now needs a Board-approved transition plan that spells out how it will deliver its targets — the actions, timeframes, assumptions, and dependencies.

Open detail →

15-month flexibility

Category A companies must publish the plan within 15 months of Target Validation (sooner if local regulation requires it). If you're setting near-term scope 1 intensity or asset-transition targets, that grace period disappears — the plan publishes at validation.

← Back

STRATEGY · CNZS-C2.3

Carbon strategy and commercial strategy, joined up

Your transition plan can't gather dust in a sustainability drawer — it has to align with, or fold into, your corporate strategy.

Open detail →

If your plans lean on unabated fossil fuels, your transition plan must commit to phasing out that revenue in line with net-zero pathways. Revisit it at least every five years, so it stays current as your strategy evolves.

← Back
Publishing your transition plan:
Definitive requirements: the published Standard, Chapter 1 (CNZS-C1–C2).

04 · BASELINE

Measure from where you are now.

v2 moves the base year to your latest data, asks for limited assurance, and makes you name the emissions that move the needle.

CNZS-C4 · At the start of every five-year cycle, you move your base year forward to the most recent year with comprehensive data. This continues your decarbonization; it doesn't restart it. You still show progress cycle over cycle, and you can keep reporting against an earlier reference year too.

Assuring your base-year inventory · CNZS-C7:

CNZS-C6 — Alongside your inventory, you name and quantify the emissions-intensive activities (EIAs) across your value chain, working from the SBTi's reference list. An EIA counts as significant once it reaches 5% or more of your scope 3 emissions (categories 1–14), and you report both its absolute emissions and its share of the total. You can't assume an EIA away without running the analysis — and wherever significant EIAs turn up, your transition plan has to show how you'll decarbonize them.

Could this apply to my business?

These activities often prove emissions-intensive. If any sit in your operations or value chain, run the 5% analysis:

  • Fossil fuel extraction, refining & distribution
  • Power & heat generation from fossil fuels
  • Cement, lime & concrete
  • Iron & steel
  • Aluminium & other primary metals
  • Chemicals, petrochemicals & plastics
  • Pulp, paper & packaging
  • Aviation
  • Maritime shipping & freight
  • Road freight & heavy transport
  • Livestock, dairy & animal feed
  • Land-use change & deforestation (palm oil, soy, timber)
  • Mining & mineral processing

CNZS-C8 — When your structure, boundaries, or activities shift materially mid-cycle — a merger, a divestment, a 5% move in any scope's emissions — you recalculate your base-year inventory and refresh every metric built on it.

Definitive requirements: the published Standard, Chapter 2 (CNZS-C4, C6–C8).

05 · SCOPE 1

Scope 1: three routes to total coverage.

Your near-term scope 1 target has to reach every direct tonne you emit — 100% coverage. Three routes get you there; take one or combine several, and open any card for the detail.

C10.2a — Draw a straight line from your base year to residual levels by 2050 and cut absolute emissions along it. Only here does a long-term target stay optional: hit the near-term target and you're compliant. This route suits companies with no sector pathway to follow.

Best for companies whose direct emissions are straightforward: offices, retail estates, warehouses, light manufacturing, gas boilers, refrigerants, backup generators, or company vehicles.

C10.2b — Pin your scope 1 to a published sector decarbonization pathway, measured as emissions per unit of physical output. A long-term target is mandatory here, and your transition plan lands at Target Validation — no grace period.

Best for companies whose sector already has a clear decarbonisation pathway and a physical output metric — cement, steel, chemicals, power, aviation, and other heavy industry.

C10.2c — New in v2. Rather than trace an emissions curve, you commit to dated milestones to abate, retire or decommission named emitting assets — captured in an Asset Decarbonization Plan with milestones and/or a carbon budget. A long-term target is mandatory, and the route is built for asset-heavy operators.

Best for asset-heavy operators that need a credible plan to retire, replace, electrify, retrofit or phase down specific emitting assets — CHP plants, industrial boilers, kilns, furnaces, captive power assets, fleets, or production lines.

Mix routes freely; set more than one and they roll up into a single scope 1 figure, used for communication only (C10.4).

Pick Route B or C and the 15-month grace period is gone — your transition plan publishes at Target Validation, not later.

Where it applies, your transition plan must commit to phasing out revenue from unabated fossil fuels, in line with net-zero pathways.

Report bioenergy emissions and removals separately — no netting — following GHG Protocol Land Sector & Removals guidance (LSRS), alongside FLAG and removals accounting (C5.5).

Definitive requirements: the published Standard, Chapter 3 (CNZS-C10), plus C5.5, C22 and §4.2 integrity criteria.

06 · SCOPE 2

Scope 2: two ways to express the ambition.

Your near-term scope 2 target has to cover all of it — 100% of purchased electricity, heat, steam and cooling. For electricity buyers, v2 moves the question from whether an instrument exists to where you can credibly claim it.

For energy procurement teams

Treat Scope 2 as a procurement architecture problem.

Map each load to its deliverability region, keep physical reductions distinct from market-instrument implementation, and bind every PPA, green tariff, EECS Guarantee of Origin or EAC to the activity pool it is meant to cover.

Physical emissions reduction Low-carbon electricity alignment System contribution

TARGET OPTIONS · CNZS-C12

Pick how you express the target, then build the contract stack to match.

Low-carbon electricity (LCE) alignment target C12.2a

Raise the share of low-carbon electricity you use, contract, or match, climbing a linear path toward an eligible net-zero pathway. LCE now reaches past renewables: renewables, nuclear, and CCS-fitted generation all count. Take it long-term and it lands at 100% LCE (C13.2a).

Category A companies also submit projected electricity consumption at validation. If projected demand grows by more than 20% a year on average across the cycle (CAGR > 20% — e.g. 100 GWh in 2031 to 250 GWh in 2035 is a 20.11% CAGR), an emissions target becomes mandatory alongside or instead of the LCE target (C12.4).

Absolute emissions reduction target C12.2b

Drive scope 2 absolute emissions down a linear trajectory to a defined residual level, consistent with an eligible net-zero pathway. Long-term, it reaches residual levels by 2050 (C13.2b). A long-term target stays optional on this route — though Category A still files electricity demand projections at validation.

PROCUREMENT CLAIMS

EACs still count — what changes is the claim.

EACs, EECS Guarantees of Origin included, remain eligible instruments under SBTi v2. What shifts is the claim each one backs. An EAC can support a low-carbon electricity alignment or system-contribution claim — but never a physical emissions-reduction claim, unless your physical GHG inventory changes with it. Vintage counts too: the certificate has to come from a low-carbon electricity generator commissioned or repowered in the 15 years before the electricity-consumption period it matches.

ActionStrongest claim
Energy efficiency reducing electricity usePhysical emissions reduction
On-site solar consumed on sitePhysical reduction and LCE alignment
Direct-line low-carbon electricityStrong activity-level LCE alignment
Grid-connected PPA in relevant activity poolLCE alignment / target implementation / possible system contribution
Unbundled EECS GO or EACLCE alignment / target implementation, if quality rules are met
Out-of-region certificates without deliverability evidenceWeak claim; likely not robust for SBTi v2

Claim warning: Never say buying EACs reduced your emissions unless a physical inventory change explicitly backs it. Reword the claim like this:

"We reduced emissions by buying EACs."

"We matched X% of electricity consumption with eligible low-carbon electricity instruments."

"We reduced emissions by buying EACs."

"We contributed to decarbonising the electricity system through eligible instruments."

Importing power does not automatically validate a neighbour's EACs.

Physical imports can move your location-based grid factors, true. But an import flow alone won't make a neighbouring-country EAC valid for the site consuming the power. For a procurement claim, the instrument still has to fit the relevant deliverability/activity-pool rules — or qualify under a specific flexibility.

German site + German GO

Generally clean.

German site + French PPA

Can hold, once the deliverability and activity-pool/PPA rules are met.

German site + Norwegian hydro GO

Norway exporting into Europe doesn't make it robust on its own.

German site + Brazilian EAC

Not robust for Scope 2 electricity consumed in Germany.

HOURLY MATCHING · CNZS-C32-C34

Hourly matching is a procurement metric, not an emissions calculation.

In SBTi v2, hourly matching isn't a pure location-based hourly emissions calculation. It's a procurement/attribute metric — the share of electricity consumption in significant activity pools that you use, contract, or match with low-carbon electricity, hour by hour.

Threshold: that 10 GWh test runs per activity pool, not across your global total.

Activity poolAnnual electricity useHourly matching reporting?
France12 GWhYes
Italy8 GWhNo, unless part of a larger relevant activity pool
Germany50 GWhYes
Global total70 GWhNot the test by itself
Required · from 2027

Reporting the share is mandatory.

From v2's effective date of 1 February 2027, any activity pool drawing 10 GWh or more a year must calculate and report how much of its electricity it matches with low-carbon supply hour by hour (CNZS-C32). Reporting that number is not optional.

Optional · leadership

Clearing the thresholds is voluntary.

Meeting the 50 / 75 / 90% levels below is required of no one. It matters only if you want SBTi to recognise you as a leader on the Dashboard, under its optional Scope 2 Hourly Matching recognition program (CNZS-C33–C34).

Do you see yourself as a leader in your industry?

Annual matching stays the core of target implementation. Hourly matching you must report for significant activity pools, and may pursue for leadership recognition.

Target timing: leave your 2030 targets alone and ready the next cycle instead.

Validated 2030 targets? Deliver them. The quiet, real work for energy procurement is getting the 2030-2035 cycle ready. Five moves:

  1. Audit the contract stack. Map every PPA, vPPA, green tariff and EAC, then flag which ones still count past 2030.
  2. Read the load curves. Pull hourly consumption for the sites physically drawing that power, and test how well today's instruments match it hour by hour.
  3. Find the gap. Wherever hourly matching falls short marks the low-carbon supply you need to buy next.
  4. Start sourcing early. Lock in deliverable, in-pool LCE before the next cycle — and your competitors — force your hand.
  5. Bring in backup. Pull in a procurement advisory team (Arcadia or similar) to execute while the window is still open.

These rules trip people up on a first read. Leave them until the basics above are solid.

PPA FLEXIBILITY · CNZS-C30.3.b

A single PPA can cover several connected loads.

Across interconnected activity pools on a wide-area synchronous grid, you can aggregate operations when one PPA with a low-carbon electricity project in one of those pools covers the combined load — and offtake begins within 36 months of the project's commissioning.

One new PPA can therefore stand in for a stack of per-site or per-country contracts — but only where the electricity systems genuinely interconnect and the PPA ties back to a recent low-carbon project.

Valid-ish

A company draws 5 GWh in Germany and 7 GWh in France, then signs a 12 GWh PPA with a new French wind project. Treat the regions as interconnected and start offtake within 36 months of commissioning, and this can cover the aggregated load.

Not valid

A Brazilian PPA set against a German load. Different grid, no deliverability.

Not valid

Offtake begins 5 years after the project is commissioned — well past the 36-month condition, so it likely fails.

LEGACY CONTRACTS · CNZS-C30.5

Grandfathering: assemble a legacy contract register before 1 February 2027.

Long-term contracts you signed before the v2 effective date can be grandfathered for the life of the contract — though renewing one won't extend the benefit. So record exactly which loads and activity pools each legacy contract covered before that date.

For each PPA, VPPA, green tariff and GO/EAC arrangement, capture:

  • Contract signature date
  • Start date and end date
  • Renewal rights
  • Generator commissioning or repowering date
  • Technology
  • Country, bidding zone, grid region and registry
  • Annual MWh
  • Sites/activity pools covered
  • Load-weighted allocation method
  • Certificate serial numbers and cancellation evidence
  • Hourly generation data availability
  • Claim wording allowed under the contract

Grandfathered, a PPA might deliver 100% annual LCE coverage yet fall short of 100% hourly matching. Pair 100 GWh of annual consumption with 100 GWh of PPA generation, for instance, and you can land 100% annual coverage but only 55% hourly matching.

Surplus generation in one hour won't cover consumption in another, unless eligible storage or a recognised contractual arrangement shifts the timing.

MetricResult
Annual LCE coverage100%
Hourly matching55%

DELIVERABILITY REGIONS · CNZS-C30

Activity pools and deliverability: rarely as simple as countries.

An activity pool is the electricity system your load plugs into and can reasonably help decarbonise. For electricity, SBTi v2 draws these as deliverability regions rather than political borders. A country works as a proxy sometimes — but not always.

ExampleWhy country is not enough
Sweden SE1 vs SE4Same country, different bidding zones and congestion.
Italy North vs Sicily/SardiniaSame country, different grid constraints and island/interconnection issues.
Denmark DK1 vs DK2Same country, separate electricity regions.
Great Britain vs Northern IrelandSame UK, different electricity systems.
United States: ERCOT, PJM, CAISO, MISOOne country, multiple grid and market regions.
Germany/LuxembourgCross-border market logic can matter more than country border.
Generic "Europe-wide GO portfolio"Too broad unless deliverability and allocation are documented.

Practical rule: model the data down to site, country, bidding zone/grid zone, annual MWh, hourly data availability, and instrument origin. Don't just label everything "Europe".

CNZS-C23 · C30.4

Sector-level action is a fallback, never a procurement shortcut.

SBTi v2 opens sector-level action only where local or activity-pool options are structurally constrained — by regulation, infrastructure, market structure, immature certificate systems, or too little low-carbon electricity supply. Cost, internal preference, or thin procurement planning don't qualify.

Likely hard to justifyMore plausible
GermanySmall island grid with limited LCE supply
FranceJurisdiction with no credible EAC registry
SpainMarket where corporate PPAs are blocked or impractical due to regulation
NetherlandsActivity pool with demonstrably insufficient LCE supply during the target period

Even when you lean on sector-level action, show that you're also working to unlock local or regional low-carbon electricity development.

Definitive requirements: the published Standard, Chapter 3 (CNZS-C12) and Sections 4.3–4.4 (CNZS-C29–C34).

07 · SCOPE 3

Scope 3 stops being a coverage rule. It becomes a decision system.

v1 asked a single question — had you covered two-thirds of your value chain?
v2 asks two: which categories clear the 5% boundary, and which target option fits each.

1 · The 5% boundary, live

Any scope 3 category worth 5% or more of your categories 1–14 emissions falls inside your near-term target boundary (C14.1). Pick a company type to load a typical breakdown, then drag the threshold and watch categories cross the line. The shares are illustrative, drawn from what companies report to CDP.

5.0%
In boundary — needs a target Below threshold — exclude with justification

Even inside the boundary, these exclusions stay open to you: cradle-to-gate emissions of second-hand goods (cats 1–2); category 3 already mitigated through scope 1/2 targets; category 7 commuting in full; category 8 leased assets beyond your influence; category 9 transport beyond your influence; category 10 processing with unknown steps or no contractual relationship; and category 14 independent franchisees.

For every exclusion, report the condition you're relying on, the emissions it removes (absolute and as a % of scope 3), and how you plan to mitigate them (C14.3).

2 · Pick the lever per category — Table 3

Choose a category to see which target-setting options open up for it (CNZS-C15, Table 3, p.40).

Upstream

Downstream

Table 1 · Target types at a glance

Target typeScope 1Scope 2Scope 3
Near-term (5-yr) Required, all companies Required, all companies
Long-term (to 2050)

A net-zero target ties your near- and long-term targets across all three scopes together and neutralizes residuals in the target year — optional for everyone (C17).

Definitive requirements: the published Standard, Chapter 3 (CNZS-C14–C20).

08 · TARGET IMPLEMENTATION

Delivery is now a hierarchy.

v2 grades how you decarbonize, not just whether you do. Cut at source first. You earn every step down the ladder with a demonstrated structural constraint — never preference, procurement choice, or cost alone.

  1. 1

    Activity level · CNZS-C21.1

    Cut at source.

    Cut emissions inside your own operations and value chain — through efficiency, fuel switching, behind-the-meter generation, and pushing suppliers and customers to cut theirs.

    Efficiency Fuel switching Behind-the-meter generation Supplier & customer engagement

    Earns Company-level claim — the reduction shows up in your physical inventory.

  2. 2

    Activity pools · CNZS-C21.2 · C22

    Act within shared systems.

    When emissions sit in systems you share — grids, supply sheds, logistics networks — act inside them, at the smallest reasonable boundary. Market instruments can carry the low-carbon attribute: PPAs and EACs, biomethane, and mass-balance or book-and-claim for materials.

    Grid & supply-shed action PPAs & EACs Mass balance Book & claim

    Earns System-contribution claim — kept separate from your inventory reduction (C24, C37.10.c).

  3. 3

    Sector level · CNZS-C23

    Act at sector level — only while genuinely constrained.

    You reach this rung only by demonstrating a structural constraint — region- or site-specific infrastructure, regulatory, market-structure or supply limits that block higher-up action within the target timeframe. And sector action has to be the same type of activity, in a relevant geographic or system context.

    Documented structural constraint Same activity type Relevant geography

    Earns System-contribution claim — never a stand-in for activity-level cuts.

Whatever rung you act on, every instrument and project has to clear the integrity criteria — additionality, unique attribution, temporal alignment, and no double counting (CNZS-C25–C26).

Definitive requirements: the published Standard, Chapter 4 (CNZS-C21–C34).

09 · PROVE IT

Say only what you can show.

Track progress every year, face an end-of-cycle assessment, and split your public claims three ways — reduction, alignment, and system contribution, each kept distinct.

Years 1–4 · Annual progress reports — your emissions inventory, your progress against targets, and any changes to your transition plan (C36).
Year 5 · End-of-Cycle Assessment — SBTi weighs five years of reported data against your targets and reissues your validation status (C37).

THREE CLAIM TYPES · CNZS-C37.10

What your End-of-Cycle Assessment shows sets what you can say in public. Three claim types, each with its own bar of evidence.

Emissions-reduction claim · C37.10.a

Emissions reduction

The strongest claim of the three — and only a change in your physical GHG inventory against your base year can earn it.

What you can say

"We reduced our scope 1 and 2 emissions by 14% against our base year, in line with our SBTi-validated target."

Alignment claim · C37.10.b

Net-zero alignment

When activity-level actions produce measurable change in your operations or value chain, they earn a net-zero-alignment claim.

What you can say

"Our fleet electrification and supplier program are aligned with our SBTi-validated net-zero pathway."

System contribution claim · C37.10.c

System contribution

Activity-pool and sector-level actions live outside your inventory. You report them separately, and they claim only one thing — a contribution to decarbonizing the systems your value chain runs on.

What you can say

"Our book-and-claim purchases of near-zero steel contributed to decarbonizing the steel system our supply chain depends on."

C36.6 — Miss an annual milestone and your progress report has to say why, and what you're changing in your transition plan to recover. One miss alone won't void your validation.

C37.8 — At the End-of-Cycle Assessment, SBTi treats a genuine best-efforts shortfall (documented barriers, market constraints, force majeure) differently from plain inaction — yet persistent, unexplained underperformance can still trigger a status downgrade or removal from the target dashboard.

Definitive requirements: the published Standard, Chapter 5 (CNZS-C36–C37).

10 · ONGOING EMISSIONS RESPONSIBILITY

For companies that want to show the world they care about the impact they leave.

Three voluntary tiers — Engaged, Advanced, Leadership — reward companies that own the emissions they haven’t eliminated yet. Come 2035, the voluntary part ends.

TABLE 4 · CNZS-C40

Ongoing Emissions Responsibility (OER) asks you to answer for what you haven't eliminated — through finance or removals — in step with your ambition.

Engaged

1%

of total ongoing scope 1, 2 & 3 emissions

No mandated price

Match your covered emissions in volume (tCO₂e) with verified mitigation outcomes — or set a contribution budget at a price you choose.

Advanced

10%

of total ongoing emissions, including 100% of scope 1 + 2

$20 / tCO₂e

A contribution budget of covered emissions × $20/tCO₂e, or verified mitigation outcomes matching covered emissions in volume.

Leadership

100%

of total ongoing emissions (Category A) — or, for Category B, 10% including 100% of scope 1 + 2 (C40.6)

$80 / tCO₂e

A contribution budget of covered emissions × $80/tCO₂e and verified mitigation outcomes matching covered emissions in volume.

Illustrative calculator — pick a company size

Pick a profile to see what each OER tier could mean in tCO₂e and an indicative annual contribution budget.

Figures are illustrative only, built on a 5-year average of "ongoing" emissions — the share you haven't eliminated yet. They're not a quote and don't reflect your actual inventory.

2035 AND BEYOND · CNZS-C45–C46

From 2035 the choice disappears: every company backs eligible carbon removals covering at least 1% of ongoing emissions, rising linearly to 100% by their net-zero year — with long-lived removals taking a growing share (C45). CNZS-C45

By 2050 your remaining emissions should sit at residual levels — for most sectors, no more than about 10% of your base-year footprint — and you neutralize 100% of those residuals every year with eligible carbon removals (C46). OER is the on-ramp between now and then: it grows the removals market and builds the internal muscle you'll need at the finish line.

Definitive requirements: the published Standard, Chapter 6 (CNZS-C40, C45–C46) and Table 4.

11 · ABOUT ME · GET IN TOUCH

Built for you & me.

I built this site to help anyone interested in sustainability get to grips with this major standard upgrade. I hope you’ve found it more fun than reading 100 pages of technical guidance…

The author

Thibault Guenat

Senior Carbon & Energy Manager, Arcadia

Connect on LinkedIn →

I help companies measure and reduce their emissions, and navigate compliance and internal stakeholder engagement. I want teams across the organisation to use carbon data to build a more sustainable future.